Institutional Review Board
Role of IRB at UMHB
The role of the IRB, broadly defined, is to ensure the safety of humans involved in research or laboratory activities conducted by UMHB, its employees, students or staff. The IRB is charged with facilitating and approving responsible use of humans in research endeavors at UMHB. Thus the principal role of the IRB is to ensure the ethical and safe use of human subjects who are fully informed to the risks and benefits of the research, as well as their rights as participants.
The IRB at UMHB is composed of people with professional expertise in various areas of science, social science, ethics, law, business, statistics, and research methodology. An external committee member chosen from the Temple/Belton community who has no formal ties with UMHB is also included in the composition of the committee. The current list of current IRB members is below:
- Dr. Rochelle Cade, Chair
- Dr. Lem Taylor, Vice Chair
- Dr. Randy Hendricks
- Dr. Aaron Baggett
- Dr. Phyllis Hooten
- Dr. Michele Hackney
- Dr. Chrisann Merriman
- Dr. Kindyle Brennan
- Ms. Jen Jones
As a deliberative body, the IRB determines if research protocols from both faculty and faculty-sponsored (for student research projects) investigators follows the guidelines for protecting human subjects. The IRB will determine if the application is:
- Approved with revisions
- Not approved
The UMHB IRB must approve activities in the following categories:
- Research projects involving the use of humans as subjects:
- whether the procedure involves no risk or considerable risk;
- whether or not the protocol involves deception of subjects;
- if the subjects are UMHB students;
- if the investigators are UMHB employees.
- Classroom or laboratory activities involving any of the following:
- physically invasive activities such as blood drawing;
- physically taxing activities such as a stress test; any activity where the student must ingest any substance (other than food);
- any psychological or personality testing or any testing procedure not aimed at academic evaluation;
- any activity where there is a risk of personal information becoming public;
- any painful procedure;
- any procedure involving psychological risk;
- any activity where the student is or might be exposed to risk of contact with any potentially dangerous, infectious, toxic, or radioactive substances.
Research activities in which the only involvement of adult human subjects will be in one of the following categories are exempt from IRB review:
- Anonymous surveys or questionnaires
- Research involving the study of existing data, documents or records if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects.
- Interviews of a non-personal nature
These exemptions do not include studies involving minors as participants or archival data previously gathered from minors. The IRB retains final judgment as to whether a particular activity is covered by this policy. Investigators who believe their study is exempt from review must submit a completed proposal to the IRB chairman to receive an exemption waiver to perform the activity at UMHB.
- The clarity and quality of explanation of the study as it influences the IRB's ability to understand the background, aim(s), scope, procedure(s) and experimental method(s) of the protocol. This is very important and lack of explanation in any of these areas could lead to a delay in the approval process.
- The nature and proposed implementation of the safeguards the author(s) proposes to limit the possibility of any risks that are associated with the study.
- The structure and content of the "Informed Consent Form" ensures that the form explains the aims and procedures of the experiment to the participants. The IRB encourages all applicants to use the Informed Consent Checklist document as a resource when constructing the application.
- The assessment of the risk to benefit ratio to the study participants.
The time and resources the committee has at its disposal are limited, thus each applicant should ensure that their application is complete and has appropriately addressed each question. Incomplete applications or applications that do not adequately address each issue may result in delays or a rejection of your application.
Electronic submission of the completed application is required and should be sent to Dr. Rochelle Cade. Applications will only be accepted if they are submitted as one Microsoft Word document.
Applications involving UMHB students, regardless of level,must be submitted by the designated Faculty Supervisor for that project.The primary student associated to that project should be copied on the email correspondence when submitting the application.
Faculty Supervisors are responsible for determining that the IRB application is complete, the information is accurate, and that all necessary forms (i.e., consent, assent, questionnaire, survey, etc.) have been included in the file. This policy helps ensure that applications are not rejected because of lack of content, thus delaying the process and possible approval.
Expedited Review: The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at UMHB will review all appropriate applications in an expedited review process. All proposals including items that authors believe are low-risk and could be reviewed in an expedited fashion should submit their completed application to the IRB Chair and that application will be initially reviewed. If it is deemed that the application fits the expedited review criteria, the IRB Chair will distribute that application to one member for review. If approved or deemed exempt, the IRB Chair will send revision requests to the author(s) and once those are complete the approval letter or exemption waiver will be issued electronically.
Expedited review applications do not have to be reviewed at the full IRB monthly meetings. Expected time of review/approval is 10-14 days from the date of the submitted application.
Full Board Review: Applications that involve research studies using human subjects that are above "low-risk" are required to submit a full application and appropriate documents pertaining to the study. All applications are reviewed at the regularly scheduled IRB meetings. All authors will receive a decision within 5-7 business days following each meeting. If approved, the IRB Chair will send revision requests to the author(s) and once those are complete the approval letter will be issued electronically.
All applications, expedited and full review, should follow the guidelines below:
Rationale: The application should begin with a description of the research background and rationale for the project. The research question(s) being addressed should be clearly outlined and must align with the research design.
Methods: The methodology to perform the project should be described completely. Key areas that must be addressed include: how many subjects will be used, how they will be recruited, possible risks to subjects (both physical and psychological), plans for the data including statistical analysis plan, method(s) and safeguards to limit risks associated with participation.
Informed Consent Document and Checklist: An informed consent document that fully informs potential subjects of the nature of the activity should be constructed and included in every IRB application. Author(s) should refer to the Informed Consent Checklist and use it as a guideline for constructing the informed consent document. Subjects should be given a copy of the informed consent to keep for their records if the consent process takes place in person. The informed consent document should be submitted exactly as it will be used (e.g., correct formatting, on letterhead, etc.) and any changes to such document are subject to review and approval by the Chair of the IRB.
Protocols using minors as subjects must acquire parental consent since the parent bears the responsibility of consenting to the child's participation in a study. In addiiton, assent forms for the minor must be included as well.
Research Instrument(s) to be used (such as surveys, interview questions, etc.): If the research study involves the use of an interview protocol or a survey questionnaire instrument, submit a copy as an appendices in the application document. Other examples of appropriate items could include subject recruitment/advertisement documents, possible signature pages, approval letters from state or district supervisors, etc.
Appendices: Attach all information pertinent to the proposal, such as approval/consent letters already received from participating agencies, school districts, companies, etc. and refer to them in the application where appropriate.
The IRB typically meets on the second Tuesday of each month. This may be adjusted for academic events, holidays, or other scheduled events. The rolling deadline for submission of IRB proposals is the typically the last business day of each month by 5pm unless otherwise specified. This deadline is strictly adhered to in order to allow ample time for the IRB members to review all applications.
Tuesday, September 11 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Friday, August 31 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, October 9 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Friday, September 28 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, November 13 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Wednesday, October 31 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, December 11 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Friday, November 30 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, January 22 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Friday, December 28 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, February 12 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Tuesday, January 31 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, March 19 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Tuesday, February 28 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, April 9 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Friday, March 31 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Tuesday, May 14 at 2:30
- Applications should be submitted by Friday, April 28 at 5:00 pm for this meeting.
Applications that are reviewed in an expedited fashion are reviewed as they are recieved. Typical response time is 10-14 business days from the day of the submission.
For applications reviewed at the monthly IRB meetings, after the committee meets an email stating the decision is sent to the author of the proposal with copies to the faculty advisor (if applicable).
- Proposals “approved” as written are allowed to begin upon receiving the email containing the electronic version of the approval letter from the Chair of the IRB. The time frame for issuing this letter is typically 1-3 business days following the meeting.
- Proposals exempt from review are allowed to begin upon notification. The Chair of the IRB will send an exemption waiver electronically to the author for their records within 1-3 business days following the the determination of exempt status assuming no revisions are needed.
- Proposals “approved with modifications” must not begin until all requirements are met and final approval is given in writing. Within 5-7 business days, the author(s) will receive an email from the Chair of the IRB with a list of revisions. The time frame for approval if a proposal is approved with minor revisions (that are mandatory) is highly dependent on the author and the time that it takes to make all revisions.
- Proposals “not approved” may be revised and submitted. Within 5-7 business days, the author(s) will receive an email from the Chair of the IRB with a list of concerns that must be addressed. In this case, the author must resubmit a full application which will be subject to full review at a subsequent IRB meeting. In the event that a proposal lacks too much information for the IRB to make a decision on the proposal, the application will be not be approved.
The primary reason that an application could be “not approved” usually results from an incomplete application. Any missing items or lack of clarification of important information in the proposal can result in the proposal being denied and thus will be delayed until the next scheduled meeting (~one month).
The University, the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and individual investigators share a collective responsibility to ensure that research involving human subjects is guided by the highest ethical standards and is conducted in compliance with federal, state and university regulations governing such research. To assist the IRB and investigators in meeting these requirements, all researchers and investigators (students, staff, faculty, etc.) must complete an online training module that provides UMHB investigators convenient access to comprehensive and regularly updated human subject’s research guidance. The training module can be obtained through:
Submitting Training Documentation to the UMHB IRB
Documentation of training should be included in the appendix section at the end of the completed IRB application. Documentation should be submitted for all investigators involved with the study, including faculty. Completion of the training should be renewed every 3 years.
As of September 1, 2018, submission of IRB applications will occur through software and will no longer be submitted by email. Please follow the link below to login in and access the software. To log in, use your UMHB OneLogin credentials.
If you would like to write or revise your content before submitting in the software, you can use the links below. Once you have finalized your content, you can copy and paste the content into the software. Please do not submit these documents to the IRB.
Below is a list of links that could be useful during the research and IRB process:
- The Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP)
- Compliance Oversight Information on the federal guidelines regarding the protection of human subjects (Title 45, Part 46, of the Code of Federal Regulations).
- Qualtrics link for faculty - students will be provided with a link by their faculty member
Contact the IRB
General questions regarding the IRB process at UMHB, an individual's rights as a participant or any other questions regarding a particular research project, contact the Chair of the IRB:
Dr. Rochelle Cade
firstname.lastname@example.org • (254) 295-4612
Dr. Colin Wilborn • Dean, College of Health Sciences
email@example.com • (254) 295-4488
900 College Street, Box 8402 • Belton, TX 76513
Page last updated September 27, 2018